Read an Excerpt

Traditional Witchcraft and the Pagan Revival

A Magical Anthropology

John Hunt Publishing Ltd.

CHAPTER 1

Echoes of Time and the River (Prologue)

One of the most striking features of the history of all religion is the way in which people have clung to the holy places of their far-off ancestors. It appears that once a site was sanctified through worship, an incoming people whether aggressive invaders, or the peaceful missionaries, gained prestige by occupying the site. When this was done, the old religion could be overthrown and the area purified with new ritual and religious observance.

Readers Digest, Folklore, Myths and Legends of Britain

When we read about ancestral British paganism today, more often than not, it is tinged with the rosy hue of the noble savage and wishful thinking, rather than based on progressive archaeological or anthropological discovery. For the first half-million years after our pre-human ancestors slowly morphed into a recognisable form, they were still primitives who left relatively little evidence of their existence except for a few bones and Palaeolithic tools. The emergence from the hunter-gatherer era to the development of agriculture, the domestication of animals, pottery and weaving, is a mere 10,000 years ago; while 'civilisation' as we understand it, only dates back some 5,000 years.

Unfortunately, in the rush to establish the many different forms of 20th century revivalist paganism, the element of curiosity has often been suppressed in favour of historical ignorance. Anything that is non-Christian in origin is immediately embraced as 'pagan', despite the fact that much of it had little to do with the indigenous people of the British Isles. It also leads to the acceptance of 'fakelore and fantasy' as the basis for a considerable amount of contemporary thinking. Reviewing one of these pseudo-history books in White Dragon magazine some years ago, the editor wrote: 'Books like this pose more of a danger to paganism than the Christian Right will ever do, because they are the enemy within, subverting the Mysteries and dumbing down for spirituality's equivalent of the day-time television audience.' Ouch!

Never before, however, in the entire history of religion, have ancient beliefs been so popular, or so socially acceptable. For some time now, there have been organisations campaigning for governmental recognition of 'paganism' as a legitimate form of religion or worship, despite the opinions of many of the old brigade, that paganism per se is not a religion but an umbrella term for a wide variety of loosely linked modern revivalist 'traditions' or 'paths'. In The New Believers, a book covering 'sects, cults and alternative religions', David V. Barrett is not wide off the mark in describing the contemporary esoteric pagan scene in the following terms:

Some are a synthesis of Western (Judaeo-Christian) and Eastern (Hindu, Buddhist or Sufi) thought; others could be described as mystical, magical, Judaeo-Christianity. Many believe in Secret Masters who have tremendous powers and who have guarded the true religious teaching ... Some are, in one way or another Gnostic, in that they emphasise secret knowledge, restricted to a select few ... Because nearly everything that can be called neo-Pagan is eclectic, borrowing from several sources, there are overlaps between the various forms of neo-Paganism. There are links between some forms of Wicca and Druidry, and between both of these and Shamanism ...

From a 21st century standpoint, however, much of what now passes for pagan belief has jettisoned its former labels of 'occultism', 'witchcraft' and 'eccentricity', and now boasts a diverse doctrine, suitable for pre-pubescent schoolchildren to venerable pensioners, from all walks of life and cultures. On the traditionalist's side, this hard-won respectability means that, in many cases, both the genuine magical and Mystery aspects of the Old Ways have been abandoned in favour of a wholesome image more reminiscent of the fictitious 'Oxo family' than of the real-life Lancashire Witches.

It must be said from the onset that there is nothing wrong in anyone embracing a neo-pagan life-style. What we should try to do, however, is put into some kind of perspective the impact of the magico-religious links with our ancestral roots when we choose to follow a path or tradition that is alien to our own genius loci – the collective or natural spirit of old Pretannia. Whatever numerous contemporary authors may tell us, the Celts were not the indigenous people of these islands; modern Wicca is not synonymous with traditional witchcraft; traditional British Old Craft is not a myth; and subsequent invading cultures did not impose blanket religious conversions on a conquered people.

But what of the witchcraft, magic and Mysteries of what people today refer to as the Old Ways? They have existed for thousands of years, so can they really be so easily replaced in the Collective Unconscious? Is it true, as occult author Colin Wilson regularly maintains, that no one believes in magic any more? Is it too late to re-connect with the Old Ways?

The answer to those questions is, of course, a resounding; 'No! No! No!' – but we need to go back to our roots for the key. Or, more precisely, to the roots of the path or tradition to which we feel instinctively drawn. As the editor of White Dragon went on prophetically to observe, the real enemy of the Old Ways was never modern Christian (or even Islamic) fundamentalism, but the introduction of a contemporary eclectic, pick-and-mix approach that maintains that all universal god/desses are one, and that any permutation will do when it comes to supplication. At the advanced academic, theological, or higher ritual magic end of the spectrum this may be the case but at grass roots level, where most of us operate, it is essential to understand which deity (or force) represents a particular psychic energy ... when, where and why ... and how to tap into it.

In purely magical terms, Aphrodite is not compatible with Artemis and Athene; Isis does not equate with Diana or Freya – none of whom are indigenous goddesses to these islands. It is also important to accept that Names of Power do not represent real people, semi-divine or otherwise: this is a Christian concept that God is sitting there just waiting for our call. It is also detrimental to effective magical thinking. In magic, we use these mind-pictures, or correspondences, as a means of invoking (or evoking) the conceptualised power of individual energy-sources.

* In ancient times, the priesthood understood this – even if the common man did not.

In simple terms, imagine for a moment that we are faced by a huge bank of colour-coded electrical sockets, all having different strengths of electrical current running through them. These sockets represent the source of this elusive 'god-power'. In our hands we have a selection of colour-coded plugs representing the nature of the magical working we wish to undertake. If we make the wrong choice and connect, say, the red plug to a blue socket, it could result in:

• insufficient current coming through to power the magical working, or

• overload, in which case we blow a fuse and the whole working is either negated or incinerated.

This bank of sockets can also been seen as representing the Qabalistic Tree of Life, because each sphere (sephirah), is powered by different types of energy that are essentially both male and female, i.e. androgynous. To perform successful magical workings we must know exactly what we are plugging into before we start. In popularist teaching the goddess is All – and, as a result, the channelling of magical energies is knocked out of kilter, because in magical terms, Pan is All (Pan Pangenetor, the All-Begetter, represented by the 'Devil' in the Tarot). The experienced practitioner, however, isn't bothered about gender – he or she is bothered about getting on the right contacts and obtaining results. This is not denigrating anything; it is attempting to show that the modern witch or magical practitioner needs to think in purely abstract terms about magical energy and its application, not in religious or gender-specific ones.

Magic, of course, works best when there is a genuine magical partnership between god and goddess, man and woman. In certain kinds of rite, the woman knows that for it to be performed effectively, she remains passive/receptive, while her partner has the active/dynamic role. In other rituals it will necessitate the woman taking the active/dynamic role, while her partner remains passive/receptive. It's all a question of the energies being used in the correct manner for a particular ritual and nothing to do with gender superiority.

* In ancient times, the priesthood understood this – even if the common man did not.

Even if we work as solitary practitioners, we still need to understand that equilibrium is necessary to kick-start a magical operation – whether it be a simple healing charm, or a full-blown, bells and smells ritual. By mixing and mingling the energies of deities from different cultures, we negate not only their magical power, but also their spiritual influence, if we allow them to neutralise each other. And what many mistake for divine presence is merely an endorphin rush, caused by the transmission of chemical messages from the brain, which have the characteristic properties of opiate compounds such as morphine.

It has been medically acknowledged that there is a naturally occurring opiate in the human nervous system that can be induced by the clever use of music/rhythm/dance and language techniques. These naturally occurring endorphins produce the effect of 'spiritual mainlining' and those who experience the feel-good factor resulting from it are often convinced that deity has indeed touched them. The various priesthoods, pagan and otherwise, have been exploiting this reaction for years; while many solitary worshippers can induce it in themselves with repetitive chanting or dancing.

This, of course, explains where the 'Well, it works for me!' reasoning comes into the equation, that is so prevalent in many pagan responses, should they be criticised for their eclectic approach, or advised that a technique is wrong. Others claim to be expressing their own feelings in relation to their pagan belief, but perhaps we should ask ourselves, how can we express something unless we know what that something is, or if we haven't learned the basic canon for expressing it?

* In ancient times, the priesthood understood this – even if the common man did not.

Exploring Spirituality, co-written by myself and Aeron Medbh-Mara, pointed out that over the past few decades the focus of religion has moved from being of benefit to the group, to being the tool of the individual. Self-help psychology has played a large part in this shift, since it teaches that all the individual needs is within ourselves and, as a result, many of those following such 'experts' have subsequently become divorced from their spiritual roots. For practitioners of pagan ideologies, the thought processes are a little more insidious. Whereas the psychologist denies the existence of external deities, the modern pagan priesthood has a tendency to embrace the notion of every deity in existence, irrespective of its background, preference or allegiance.

What Exactly is Modern Paganism?

If we turn to contemporary publishing for the answer, we will find a veritable torrent of titles encompassing the 'mind, body and spirit' classification. Very little, however, offers up an erudite explanation for the here and now, about the cultural influences of the dim and distant past, without muddying the waters further downstream for the future. One publication defined the term paganism as 'nature worship that embraces the wider influences of other cultures, including Norse, Egyptian, Celtic, etc.,' in a form of 'eclectic paganism as it is increasingly becoming known'. Another popular release, jumping on the recent Tolkien-revival bandwagon, repeatedly talked about the Celts being the indigenous peoples of these isles – probably the same author who failed Michael Howard's (of The Cauldron) famous Celtic Potato test!

What You Call Time offered up a broad overview of how genuine Old Crafters saw themselves in terms of contemporary pagan labelling. What was immediately obvious was that even then (1998) the gulf between the various pagan, Wiccan and Craft traditions was immense, and many of these drastic changes had occurred within the previous three decades and for reasons we will discuss in a later chapter. Three traditional Old Craft witches gave their responses:

As a witch of long standing, I refuse to compromise my own integrity by pandering to the current demand for the politically correct, neo-paganism that is now passing itself off as Craft. It's time people understood that Craft isn't for everyone.

It's about harnessing the natural energies in a time-honoured way. This is our way of life, it's being going on for centuries and we know the magic works. We have no intention of changing our ways and would rather go into the shadows than compromise.

We will continue to refuse 'initiation on demand' in order to satisfy the 'gimme, gimme' mentality of the modern generation of would-be witches, who seem to think it their right to claim kinship on the grounds that it is now fashionable to be labelled a Wiccan or pagan.

Unfortunately, a great deal of modern pagan worship is an eclectic cross-pollination of different cultures, which means that contemporary British paganism is indeed shot through with Celtic, Druidic, Roman, Anglo-Saxon and Norse influences, not forgetting a frequent Roman, Greek, Egyptian and Oriental overlay. 'Which is not conducive to successful magic,' added another witch. 'It might appear to be a broad-based view of religious thinking but from the magical perspective, it is completely self-defeating.'

We can see that things have evolved a long way from the primal applications of traditional Old Craft, through the highly formalised rituals of the Gardnerian and Alexandrian traditions, to emerge as the informal, eco-pagan worship of modern Wicca. In fact, a large majority of pagans are adamant that they do not practice any form of magic despite buying thousands of books on charms and spellcasting for the purpose of attracting a mate, divination, crystal lore, gaining wealth and healing. A growing number admit to not knowing the name of Gerald Gardner, the 'Founding Father' of the belief they profess to follow, and tantamount to a self-proclaimed Christian not knowing who Jesus was! They make their claims on the grounds that the focus of their devotion is centred on the goddess/mother figure and that this way is open to all; even though a large number of the rituals given in popular books on the subject are thinly disguised ritual magic and Freemasonry served up as goddess worship.

Fortunately there are always those whose curiosity prompts them to dig deeper and discover the true Old Ways – but this is not always as easy as they would wish. Magical tutors are often confronted by the situation whereby if the student has not been admitted to the Inner Secrets of the Cosmos by Lesson Four, they become disgruntled. Then, taking what little information they have managed to ingest, they go off to start a group of their own, thereby perpetuating the watering down of Craft-lore every time there is a division of interest. Magical development can be likened to learning a new language. We may have a smattering of well-known phrases and colloquialisms at guidebook level, but if we wish to become fluent speakers, then we need to go back to basics to learn the lesser mysteries of grammar and syntax.

As experienced magical practitioners know, these Lesser Mysteries are in themselves merely the next level of basic teachings that are available to all, whether in book form or by elementary tuition. What many choose to ignore is the existence of the Greater Mysteries, which can only be understood through personal quest and experience: they cannot be taught in words. As Alan Richardson points out in his Introduction to the Mystical Qabalah, 'Books and teachers can only give a few inadequate methods to reach the wisdom that is nowhere else but within the seeker. That is why it is a pointless exercise searching through books for any Universal Secret. It does not exist.'

This is not, of course, what would-be seekers wish to hear, despite the fact that this is the only explanation any genuine tradition or teacher can possibly give. It is probably a bitter pill to swallow, as we have all, in our time, assembled an impressive working knowledge of other people's rituals and correspondences – but for what purpose? The more we learn, the more we expect to be the recipients of higher or advanced information in order to progress magically or mystically. But to go back to Alan Richardson: 'The rest is up to us, for there is no dogma, no secret teachings, no mysterious Adepts, nor anything which can help us avoid doing a great deal of work ...'

Neither should the seeker be fooled by a tradition that claims to trace its antecedents back to medieval or even pre-historic times. Even archaeologists and historians cannot provide information as to how the paths to these ancient Mysteries were structured, so it is pointless for a 20th century revivalist organisation to claim that it does! In all reality, the tracing of any genuine Old Craft coven back more than 150 years is a challenge in itself. That said it is still possible to honour the gods as they were honoured within their own time and place within Britain's long history of religious and cultural development.
(Continues...)

---

Excerpted from Traditional Witchcraft and the Pagan Revival by Mélusine Draco. Copyright © 2013 Mélusine Draco. Excerpted by permission of John Hunt Publishing Ltd..
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.

---